RAFO President, Jen Wilson, is holding a Q & A session for the membership on March 26, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. CST. In this meeting, she will answer questions about the referendum items that will be voted on Tuesday, April 2 from 10 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. in the AUD 256 and Wednesday, April 3 from 1:00 – 6:00 p.m. in WB 1315.
To attend the meeting, click this link https://roosevelt.zoom.us/j/
RAFO asks its members to vote on three items at the Spring 2019 membership meeting. All full bargaining unit members have the right to vote in person by ballot. Voting will occur on Tuesday, April 2 from 10 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. in the AUD 256 and Wednesday, April 3 from 1:00 – 6:00 p.m. in WB 1315. During March, RAFO will hold a Q & A session by Zoom conference to address concerns and feedback from the membership (date and time TBD).
- Roosevelt University Adjunct Faculty Organization seeks to eliminate the position of Communication Chair from our Executive Officers as listed within the Bylaws - Article Two, Section A.
- Voting members who wish to serve on the Executive Committee must be no lower than Step Two members, per the RAFO CBA.
- Dues will be increased $25.00 from $125.00 per semester to $150.00 per semester.
RAFO is proud to request papers from members for our professional development conference! Download the RFP here
RAFO Professional Development Conference
Adjunct to Adjunct
April 26, 2019 (9:30 a.m. - 3 p.m.)
RAFO is excited to invite you to share your best practices with RAFO colleagues.
Be a speaker and present what strategies and practices work in your classroom. We want to know what you do best! Adjunct to adjunct, let’s share our best-kept secrets! Network with other adjuncts to share and sharpen your skills while learning from each other.
If you don’t want to present, be a participant and attend sessions providing opportunities for networking and sharing.
RAFO is currently accepting proposals from presenters.
Potential topics include
- Classroom Management (online or on-site)
- Engaging Students in Course Discussions/Student-Centered Activities
- Experiential Learning
- Providing Verbal Feedback to Students
- Using ZOOM in the classroom
- Defining the Common Core
- Other topics related to teaching and learning
Proposals are due by March 30.
Proposals should include
- Presentation Title
- Brief Description of your presentation
- Your name, Department, College
- E-mail and Phone # to contact you
Dr. Ami Hicks, VP RAFO
Professional Development Chair
Presenting and/or participating in this conference will be a great CV or resume builder!
P.S. We are still accepting mini-grant applications!
On February 8, IEA Region 67 sponsored a forum for Chicago mayoral candidates. Collectively, the group chose to endorse the candidacy of Lori Lightfoot. Ms. Lightfoot spoke passionately - and personally - about the transformative possibilities of higher education and communicated strongly-held positions on each of the categories of policy that were discussed.
Summary of Lori Lightfoot's statements on issues specific to City Colleges:
- Ms. Lightfoot recognized that program consolidations through Reinvention have severely damaged enrollment at City Colleges, and that forcing our students to travel great distances across the city to complete their degrees simply does not make sense.
- Ms. Lightfoot was also critical of the current mayor's approach to contract negotiations and stated that expired contracts fuel instability. She emphasized the need to build relationships before bargaining to encourage settlement of contracts before they expire.
- On the topic of free (community) college tuition, Ms. Lightfoot spoke of the need for equity and opportunity, but qualified this by stating that not every student needs to have their tuition subsidized, depending on a student’s need. She would create a pool of funds for those who are most in need and seek ways to make college more affordable.
- Finally, Ms. Lightfoot was generally supportive of the creation of an elected Board of Trustees for Chicago Public Schools and City Colleges, but offered a caveat about the ways in which big money can undermine the principle behind elections.
- On public safety: Public safety cannot be a commodity that only the wealthy can afford.
- On TIF (Tax Increment Financing): Good concept, bad implementation. These funds should be used in communities and neighborhoods that need them; not downtown development and at Navy Pier.
- On pensions: Pension promises must be kept, but tax dollars are precious. She would appoint a risk manager to oversee the city budget and create a board of advisors for the pension fund.
Though the group was highly impressed with all of the candidates who spoke, there was a consensus around Ms. Lightfoot. Susana Mendoza and Toni Preckwinkle also attended and their statements and policy positions were also well-received. Bill Daley was invited, but was unable to attend. Amara Enyia was also invited, but her campaign did not respond to our invitation.
Based on the results of the February 26 election, Region 67 presidents may reconvene to endorse a run-off candidate. The group also chose to dual-endorse Marianne Lalonde and Erika Wozniak Francis for Alderman of the 46th Ward.
*IEA Region 67 consists of City Colleges Contingent Labor Organizing Committee, Morton Adjunct Faculty Association, Roosevelt Adjunct Faculty Organization, United Staff of Columbia College, Triton Adjunct Faculty Association, and St. Xavier University. The presidents of these unions were responsible for voting to support Ms. Lightfoot.
Without warning or discussion of the damage it would do to students and schools, Illinois lawmakers imposed a 3 percent threshold on final average earnings salary increases for any education employees participating in the Teachers’ Retirement System (TRS) or State Universities Retirement System (SURS).
Please sign this petition to encourage lawmakers to reverse this terrible piece of legislation and show educators that their work is valued and that teachers and professors deserve respect.
Tell them to rescind the 3 percent threshold and to support HB 350 and SB 60.
In the final 48 hours of the 2018 legislative session, Illinois’s four legislative leaders sneaked into the budget implementation bill a measure making school districts or universities financially liable for any contribution to those employees’ salaries larger than a 3 percent increase in the final 10 years of their careers. Because educators qualify for a pension after five years and can leave at any time, districts and higher ed institutions would likely institute a 3 percent threshold across the entire contract.
As a result of this legislation, teachers would likely be denied extra compensation for after-school work that benefits students, such as coaching, directing plays, tutoring in the evenings, taking classes toward advanced degrees and, therefore, devaluing the continuing education of our educators and ultimately harming students. In addition:
Reducing benefits to educators will make the already serious Illinois teacher shortage even worse.
At a time when committees are being formed to try to figure out how to keep graduating seniors from fleeing the state and choosing instead to stay at Illinois higher education institutions, this action will drive professors away from the profession.
This would financially harm the teachers of this state who devote their careers to teaching the next generation of students, impacting their salaries now and in the future, by limiting salary growth to no more than 3 percent, when rates of inflation hover around 2.5 to 3 percent each year.
Tell them to rescind the 3 percent threshold.
Page 1 of 12